|
Home
Subscribe
About The Journal
Current Issue
Editor's
Comments
Upcoming
Events
Ongoing
Activities
World
Developments
Dialoguing
What
We Are About
Articles
Media
Notes
Reports/Announcements
Funding
Past Issues
Editorial Team
Questions/Feedback
Selected Links
|
Vol. XVII,
Number 3 Spring,2003
WHAT WE ARE ABOUT
Please share with us what you are
doing relating to nonviolent change. If you send us a short report of
your
doings, learnings, ideas, concerns, reactions, queries we will print
them
here. Responses can be published in the next issue.
Steve Sachs: I am extremely concerned about the entire direction and
flow of the Bush administration, which, especially in foreign affairs,
may turn out to be the administration most destructive of the overall
interests of American citizens, and of the people of the world. This is
not merely a
difference of philosophy or policy perspective. I respect President
Bush
for having learned from and over come the shortcomings of youth, to
accomplish
a great deal. He can serve well in many capacities, but I find that he
does
not have the wisdom and statesmanship to lead a great nation in
difficult
times. His performance has been Bush league and dangerous. He has
focused
on a secondary problem (Iraq), to the exclusion of a major one (North
Korea),
which became so by his escalation – and hence has for some time needed
immediate
and appropriate attention that it has not received. In the meantime, he
has made relatively minor gains at great cost to all, in Iraq, in a
counter
productive way that considerably increases the dangers of terrorism and
the proliferations of weapons of mass destruction, that that action was
intended to decrease. At a time when the U.S. needs extensive
international
collaboration to effectively deal with major problems confronting the
entire
world, he has alienated those whom it is essential to have as
collaborators,
and a good many others as well. Domestically, he has been so fiscally
irresponsible,
as to make credible the charge that he wants to destroy the ability of
the
national government to do anything, except deal with defense and
foreign
affairs (goals that are also undermined by unfortunate fiscal and
economic
policy), plus assisting business. Mr. Bush, and a number of his
close
advisors, call themselves conservative. I hope that they will yet prove
me wrong. But at this point the administration is hardly conservative.
From
the environment, across the economy to foreign affairs, nothing is
being
conserved! It would seem technically more correct to call the
administration’s
approach “destructionist.” It may be that all of this is the
result
of a certain idealism in the administration. Having ideals is
important.
But it becomes a liability when one is caught up in them to the point
of
not seeing the full complexity of the actual concrete world. I can only
hope that the unfolding of events, quickly, will provide the
administration
with a better sense of reality.
More personally, Leah and I are looking
forward to some interesting peace and justice travel: First, presenting
a paper
and putting on a panel in the American Indian Studies section of the
Western
Social Science Association, on the impact of American Indian tradition
on
western thought and its contemporary relevance; Next, participating in
a
conference on peace from a wide range of perspectives, in the Black
Forrest;
Finally, giving a paper at the American Political
Science
Association Meetings, “Interlinking the Circles: The Impact of
Globalization
on Indigenous Peoples and Their Actions to Meet It.” I hope that
all
of you enjoy a fine spring and summer.
Top of Page
These articles and opinions of
the authors do not constitute the endorsement of Nonviolent Change nor
its publisher, Organization Development Institute, or any of its staff.
©2002, 2003, 2004,2005. All rights reserve. The Nonviolent
Change Journal is published by the Research/ActionTeam on
Nonviolent Large Systems Change - an interorganizational and
international project of The Organization Development Institute.
Permissions:
Reposting and reprints are encouraged, as long as proper source
acknowledgement is given. As a courtesy, please let us know that you
are reprinting or electronically reposting. It helps us know of the
interest level. Thank you.
|